<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The joys of 830.720 extra pixels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sparepencil.com/archives/2006/01/15/the-joys-of-830720-extra-pixels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sparepencil.com/archives/2006/01/15/the-joys-of-830720-extra-pixels/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:42:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://sparepencil.com/archives/2006/01/15/the-joys-of-830720-extra-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poisongrafix.com.ru/archives/2006/01/15/the-joys-of-830720-extra-pixels/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Man, You need to update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, You need to update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClickFanatic</title>
		<link>http://sparepencil.com/archives/2006/01/15/the-joys-of-830720-extra-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>ClickFanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poisongrafix.com.ru/archives/2006/01/15/the-joys-of-830720-extra-pixels/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>This one is much better indeed. It is the best one we have at the moment. ;)
The pixels are very crisp, but only at the ideal resolution. Sometimes they seem a bit shaky, but it&#039;s easily fixed by pressing the AUTO button.

My old monitor wasn&#039;t too bad. It was just very small and very old. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one is much better indeed. It is the best one we have at the moment. <img src='http://sparepencil.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
The pixels are very crisp, but only at the ideal resolution. Sometimes they seem a bit shaky, but it&#8217;s easily fixed by pressing the AUTO button.</p>
<p>My old monitor wasn&#8217;t too bad. It was just very small and very old. <img src='http://sparepencil.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slythfox</title>
		<link>http://sparepencil.com/archives/2006/01/15/the-joys-of-830720-extra-pixels/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>slythfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poisongrafix.com.ru/archives/2006/01/15/the-joys-of-830720-extra-pixels/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Good job. Good LCDs deliver very crisp pixels at max resolution.

Btw, 15&#039;&#039; monitors rarely support less than 1024 by 768 screen resolutions. You must have had some bad previous monitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job. Good LCDs deliver very crisp pixels at max resolution.</p>
<p>Btw, 15&#8221; monitors rarely support less than 1024 by 768 screen resolutions. You must have had some bad previous monitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
